Since there’s 4 different speakers here under the same umbrella of reviews let me say I’m strictly talking about the DB63’s here, which I can say confidently are definitely the better speaker for my ears than the 2.0 and the original Debut speaker both of which I’ve had. And most the reviews here are for the 2.0’s. these are Easily one of the best pairs of speakers you can get under $500 if not the best. I will say these do need some break in like most speakers, about 40+ hours really to get them right and the more they break in the better. And I haven’t even got them fully broken in yet. Also I can say I’ve had the Klipsch RP-600m II’s to compare, and to me these DB63’s are night and day better. I sent those 600’s back asap. I those sounded like dog ass compared to these to me lol. And here’s what some audiophile YouTube channels have to say about these… Cheap audio man on YouTube says these are tied for his pick for best speaker under $500 with the Emotiva xb2, which they both are sort of opposite ends of the spectrum with these having that better deeper bass and slightly warmer midrange and the XB2’s having that more lively top end. Also He mentioned that he actually liked the DB53’s better than the 63’s, like the midrange he said is more detailed on the 5.25 inch version, minus having less bass but with a sub that shouldn’t matter too much at all. So I will be trying those out as well and maybe sending a pair of the 63’s back if that’s the case and will update when I do. Or from Andrew Robinson who mentions these all the time for his go to recommendation for budget bookshelf speakers. (Btw his testing of these speakers in his video rendered incredibly neutral, more than some others that tested these but still it’s his anecdote in his room) Or There’s a great video from Hunter Gray LUV Music, comparing these to $1600 speakers like the KEF LS50 META’s, the Martin Logan XT B100’s, the Klipsch RP-600m II’s, and the Q acoustic 5020’s And he says these DB63’s have 90% of the performance of the KEFs and the Logan’s at 28% of the cost. And even have some aspects that sound better like the richer midrange that’s especially nice for less acoustically treated rooms. And he said he flat out likes these better than the q acoustic 5020’s which are $999 a pair. And definitely more than the RP-600 m II’s which again I fully can back given I’ve had those and sent them back. Also Erins audio corner did some tests I recommend watching his review of these if you want to get some possibly valuable info on how he EQd these to better neutralize the tone, which I included to screenshots from his video showing basically what he did at the 550 hz and 650hz and 3300 hz on his EQ software. Me personally I don’t have that ability to adjust any hz level with my denon receiver only a few options, but I don’t even use tone controls anyway because I find using MultEQ from audyssey toggled on gets me better sound than any tone controls I’ve messed with anyway, also flipping dynamic EQ on for music and then off for videos/ podcasts really helps bring out the best sounds for music in my simple setup. If dynamic EQ is on for YouTube vids/podcasts It can sometimes make the already usually lower quality voice recordings sound distorted and not so clean.. that’s just my experience, and my only complaint really is that for YouTube vids and pods these sometimes don’t sound excellent, but that’s a lot of the time the crappy recordings fault not the speakers lol, but not always. but for music these sound impeccable to me. So do what you will with that info, try them if you want send them back if you want cause Amazon primes awesome for that and so easy.